• 论文
主办单位:煤炭科学研究总院有限公司、中国煤炭学会学术期刊工作委员会
蒙陕接壤区煤层顶板涌水水源智能判别方法
  • Title

    An intelligent water source discrimination method for water inrushes from coal seam roofs in the Inner Mongolia-Shaanxi border region

  • 作者

    王皓孙钧青曾一凡尚宏波王甜甜乔伟

  • Author

    WANG Hao;SUN Junqing;ZENG Yifan;SHANG Hongbo;WANG Tiantian;QIAO Wei

  • 单位

    煤炭科学研究总院中煤科工西安研究院(集团)有限公司陕西省煤矿水害防治技术重点实验室中国矿业大学(北京) 国家煤矿水害防治工程技术研究中心

  • Organization
    China Coal Research Institute
    CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd.
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control Technology for Coal Mine Water Hazard
    National Coal Mine Water Hazard Prevention Engineering Technology Research Center, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing)
  • 摘要
    蒙陕接壤区煤炭高强度开采诱发的煤层顶板水害问题日益凸显,高效智能地判别煤层顶板涌水水源是顶板水害防治的关键。以蒙陕接壤区3个典型矿井为研究对象,将无机指标K++Na+、Ca2+、Mg2+、Cl−、SO4 2−、HCO3 −、TDS和有机指标UV254、TOC、溶解性有机质(DOM)的荧光光谱作为判别指标,利用主成分分析法(PCA)对80组地下水水样数据进行主成分提取,提出一种人工鱼群算法(AFSA)改进随机森林(RF)的PCA-AFSA-RF顶板涌水水源智能判别方法。首先,建立PCA-RF判别模型,其准确率(Ac)、精确率(Pr)、召回率(Rc)和F-measure指数(f1)分别达到了83.00%、83.17%、80.42%和79.57%;其次,通过AFSA对PCA-RF判别模型中决策树数目、树深和内部节点分裂所需的最小样本数进行寻优,在AFSA中引入遗传机制以避免陷入局部最优,建立基于PCA-AFSA-RF的煤层顶板涌水水源智能判别模型,该模型Ac、Pr、Rc、f1分别达到92.18%、91.11%、87.58%和88.82%,较PCA-RF分别提高9.18%、7.94%、7.16%和9.25%,回代准确率达到97.50%;最后,利用该模型对12个矿井水水样进行判别,结果与现场实际相一致,表明AFSA改进后的PCA-RF模型具有更好的准确性和泛化能力。研究结果可为煤层顶板涌水水源的准确判别提供新方法。
  • Abstract
    Water hazard on the coal seam proof induced by high-intensity coal mining are increasingly prominent in the Inner Mongolia-Shaanxi border region. The effective, accurate water-source discrimination of the water inrushes is the key to water hazard prevention. This study investigated three typical mines in the Inner Mongolia-Shaanxi border region. To this end, principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to extract principal components from 80 groups of groundwater samples. Then, with inorganic indicators K++Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl−, SO4 2−, HCO3 − and TDS and organic indicators UV254, TOC, and dissolved organic matter (DOM)’s fluorescence spectra as discriminant indicators, this study proposed a intelligent identificaton method of PCA-AFSA-RF roof water inrush source by using artificial fish swarm algorithm (AFSA) to improve random forest (RF). First, a PCA-RF discriminant model was established, with accuracy (Ac), precision (Pr), recall (Rc), and F-measure (f1) of 83.00%, 83.17%, 80.42%, and 79.57%, respectively. Then, in the PCA-RF discriminant model, AFSA was employed to optimize the number of decision trees, the depth of trees, and the minimum sample number needed for internal node splitting. Furthermore, a genetic mechanism was introduced into AFSA to avoid local optimization. In this way, a PCA-AFSA-RF water-source discriminant model for water inrushes on coal seam roofs was established, with Ac, Pr, Rc, and f1 of up to 92.18%, 91.11%, 87.58%, and 88.82%, respectively, increasing by 9.18%, 7.94%, 7.16%, and 9.25% compared to the PCA-RF model. Furthermore, the PCA-AFSA-RF exhibited a back substitution accuracy reaching 97.50%. Finally, this model was used for the water-source discrimination of 12 water samples from the mines, yielding results consistent with the actual results in the field. This indicates that the PCA-RF model with improved AFSA enjoys better accuracy and generalization ability. The research results of this study can provide a new method for the accurate water-source identification of water inrushes from coal seam roofs.
  • 关键词

    蒙陕接壤区顶板涌水无机−有机指标机器学习智能判别

  • KeyWords

    Inner Mongolia-Shaanxi border region;water inrushing from roof bed;inorganic-organic indicator;machine learning;intelligent discrimination

  • 基金项目(Foundation)
    国家自然科学基金项目(52204262);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2022JQ-471);中国煤炭科工集团有限公司科技创新创业资金专项重点项目(2023-TD-ZD001-001)
  • DOI
  • 引用格式
    王皓,孙钧青,曾一凡,等. 蒙陕接壤区煤层顶板涌水水源智能判别方法[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(4):76−88.
  • Citation
    WANG Hao,SUN Junqing,ZENG Yifan,et al. An intelligent water source discrimination method for water inrushes from coal seam roofs in the Inner Mongolia-Shaanxi border region[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(4):76−88.
  • 相关文章
  • 图表

    Table1

    表 1 水样测试结果
    样本号组分质量浓度/(mg·L−1)TDS/(mg·L−1)UV254/cm−1TOC/(mg·L−1)能量/R.U.来源
    K++Na+Ca2+Mg2+Cl\({\mathrm{SO}}_4^{2-} \)\({\mathrm{HCO}}_3^{-} \)C1C2
    17.5239.6610.853.0114.97174.25253.480.0551.135232.726632.142第四系水
    29.9727.755.952.264.62132.52184.260.0010.275115.454513.851
    39.2738.917.121.7410.66140.34226.800.0090.612349.998750.434
    418.9725.3411.702.853.83164.86238.000.0030.344152.114872.590
    578.2213.668.358.7427.52190.43345.030.0030.350299.350759.445
    \(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)
    1812.6769.369.425.8224.76157.31272.970.0261.344512.763228.937
    1913.5446.7114.295.5225.52193.41377.470.0050.345165.811296.028
    2010.8959.0812.704.2222.17180.03339.130.0060.739197.968495.830
    2112.7449.408.046.6313.88228.68251.270.0130.659300.391418.208
    2214.3271.1510.896.1216.46155.07367.950.0090.806132.327260.656
    2346.0241.1312.618.8615.40288.20412.270.0031.132229.075240.959白垩系水
    2449.3936.589.898.1129.08253.02386.140.0050.965249.511275.839
    2528.1335.927.922.969.54207.71292.240.0120.986366.487202.154
    \(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)
    3013.2233.855.004.798.20141.80213.000.0060.452268.605164.285
    3131.4028.347.0112.5634.09197.01299.780.0040.534239.293258.399
    3243.1235.417.099.5625.67200.54332.670.0040.776595.561443.112
    3337.6825.929.015.3619.13233.52341.010.0080.976307.999238.996
    34339.18108.7825.7025.671 139.0081.721 793.000.0040.32065.201104.888直罗组水
    35707.01502.5542.3148.002 552.39100.813 958.490.0120.78064.082121.647
    36422.76193.7521.4231.201 325.0057.892 057.000.0090.44066.31988.128直罗组水
    37692.61492.4343.1446.202 527.2394.943 901.600.0010.15154.862142.121
    38582.71470.4736.3231.632 278.2264.603 464.160.0191.060162.173344.292
    \(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)
    53719.08359.2039.8530.712 482.0090.663 726.720.0012.00824.528681.672
    541 570.56368.7047.80283.135 001.84174.967 447.440.0031.019483.462128.468
    551 483.82461.5039.6038.604 274.00118.606 425.000.0060.591519.909128.456
    561 509.74464.0058.2038.004 310.00108.306 490.000.0011.471447.015128.480
    571 528.91412.0052.6034.304 152.00105.706 288.000.0020.729293.892142.265
    58653.73320.2034.5479.161 983.06120.883 199.970.0110.750146.02596.320延安组水
    59568.37404.7735.3542.162 084.0297.391 156.460.0210.320138.98781.797
    60573.54376.6734.4462.562 057.61110.652 558.190.43110.330184.286233.345
    61600.32329.7935.8575.252 032.46106.442 111.460.2376.910513.900346.976
    62604.67341.2435.7649.222 008.16117.551 792.100.7482.201378.417305.731
    \(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)\(\vdots \)
    761 452.74462.0045.9042.404 026.00123.806 159.000.0020.329490.506134.517
    771 445.71472.0051.2045.504 109.00131.506 258.000.0050.347147.770130.002
    782 228.50428.0077.90232.005 292.00340.308 602.000.0010.253217.294110.797
    793 171.40426.5020.30112.404 388.00433.009 532.000.0060.455321.949147.930
    803 367.80337.0064.00110.204 301.00377.709 528.000.0070.706385.162132.207
    1779.07457.7647.5632.372 765.1661.384002.210.0080.00473.960305.120矿井水
    2568.56334.9631.2638.711 856.1174.623001.210.0060.294173.020466.230
    3675.56492.2335.1735.612 365.9176.413789.020.0280.570376.210131.470
    4723.63467.2543.6236.522 765.6892.133754.690.0030.940206.320166.310
    5705.93325.0633.9238.531 763.0389.522745.580.0080.570316.690306.580
    6990.36419.1650.5133.762 856.9695.213965.150.0101.060321.340134.270
    71 338.77418.3040.0732.664 013.29104.445499.680.0100.610509.340185.780
    81 446.01470.0952.1046.014 111.03132.126259.040.0100.350513.910231.650
    91 085.43462.0658.2233.284 360.55178.675550.480.0500.810148.180272.620
    101 301.63289.3664.3255.293 099.3280.215104.780.0702.820367.340186.240
    111 575.45390.0851.8930.514 835.37131.705893.060.0010.970301.290145.630
    121 814.74433.5086.28521.825 609.05380.656415.360.0501.610221.310123.810

    Table2

    表 2 总方差解释
    成分特征值累积贡献率/%
    F15.19047.182
    F21.70462.676
    F31.29974.486
    F41.06884.195
    F50.71190.657
    F60.34894.393

    Table3

    表 3 4种水源判别模型性能对比
    模型Ac/%Pr/%Rc/%f1/%K
    PCA-RF83.0083.1780.4279.574
    PCA-SVM78.5080.8778.7575.955
    PCA-MLP77.5077.9678.6274.405
    PCA-ELM52.5048.4148.8143.325

    Table4

    表 4 矿井水水样判别结果
    样本号采样点PCA-RFPCA-AFSA-RF实际类别
    1HF2-1钻孔ZZZ
    2HF7-2钻孔ZZZ
    3YS5-2钻孔ZZZ
    4掘进巷道涌水点YYY
    5掘进巷道涌水点ZYY
    6ZJ2钻孔YYY
    7ZJ3钻孔YYY
    8ZJ6钻孔YYY
    9ZJ8钻孔YYY
    10ZJ9钻孔YYY
    11副立井巷道出水点YZZ
    12副立井巷道出水点YYY
      注:Z表示直罗组水,Y表示延安组水。
相关问题

主办单位:煤炭科学研究总院有限公司 中国煤炭学会学术期刊工作委员会

©版权所有2015 煤炭科学研究总院有限公司 地址:北京市朝阳区和平里青年沟东路煤炭大厦 邮编:100013
京ICP备05086979号-16  技术支持:云智互联